Why Did a UGM Forum With Prabowo's Ministers Turn Chaotic?

8 hours ago 6

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta – A public discussion featuring senior members of President Prabowo Subianto's administration at Gadjah Mada University (UGM) in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, ended in confrontation on Monday night, June 15.

Students accused government officials of failing to address mounting public concerns over economic conditions, governance, and the implementation of Pancasila, Indonesia's state ideology.

The event, titled Kopdar Bareng Mas Dar and organized by political media platform Total Politik, was intended to discuss Pancasila—the philosophical foundation of the Indonesian state. However, the forum quickly evolved into a broader debate over the performance of the Prabowo-Gibran administration.

The discussion featured Agrarian and Spatial Planning Minister Nusron Wahid, Deputy Agriculture Minister Sudaryono, and Budiman Sudjatmiko, head of the National Team for the Acceleration of Poverty Reduction.

Why Did Students Protest?

The UGM Student Union Alliance questioned the relevance of discussing Pancasila while, in their view, the government has failed to address pressing national issues.

In a statement posted on social media following the incident, the alliance argued that many government policies have failed to tackle the root causes of economic and social problems.

The students specifically criticized the government's Free Nutritious Meals (MBG) program, one of Prabowo's flagship initiatives, claiming it consumes a significant portion of state resources while other sectors remain underfunded. They also questioned the effectiveness of the administration's Red-and-White Village Cooperatives program.

"Our regime is blind to policies that fail to address the roots of the problems," the alliance said.

The students further pointed to ongoing public demands for economic relief and government accountability, contrasting them with what they described as excessive spending by public officials on overseas trips.

One student participating in the forum accused the government of promoting Pancasila rhetorically while failing to uphold its principles in practice.

"Talking about Pancasila is meaningless if government actions contradict Pancasila's values," the student said.

The alliance stressed that their protest was not directed against Pancasila itself but was intended to push the government to demonstrate tangible commitments to social justice, human dignity, and popular sovereignty—core principles embedded in the state ideology.

How Did the Discussion Turn Chaotic?

The forum proceeded relatively calmly until the question-and-answer session began around 08:30 PM

Tensions rose after Budiman Sudjatmiko encouraged students to express their criticisms directly during the event rather than through social media.

"Feel free to criticize us here, not on social media," Budiman told participants.

Several students then challenged the officials' credibility and questioned whether government representatives were the appropriate figures to discuss Pancasila amid unresolved national issues.

The debate intensified as dozens of students moved toward the stage carrying banners bearing messages such as "Reject Betrayers of Reform" and "UGM Rejects Regime Flatterers."

The situation escalated further when plastic water bottles were thrown toward the speakers. Organizers subsequently halted the event and security personnel escorted the officials out of the venue.

Why Did the Situation Continue Outside?

The disruption did not end when the discussion was suspended.

Hundreds of students gathered outside the Innovation and Creativity Arena (GIK) building and blocked the officials' vehicles, demanding that the discussion continue in a more open format.

Witnesses reported hearing students repeatedly call for Budiman Sudjatmiko to return and engage in dialogue.

"Where is Budiman? He said he wanted a discussion," students shouted.

Facing pressure from the crowd, Nusron Wahid and Sudaryono eventually reappeared and continued discussions with students outside the venue. Budiman, however, was no longer present, leading some students to accuse him of avoiding confrontation.

What Issues Were Raised During the Open Dialogue?

During the outdoor discussion, students questioned Nusron Wahid about agrarian policies in Papua, particularly land conversion projects that critics argue have displaced Indigenous communities.

One student asked whether the minister would take responsibility for the alleged social impacts of large-scale land development projects in the eastern Indonesian region.

Nusron responded by inviting students to visit Papua and assess conditions firsthand.

The answer was met with dissatisfaction, as students argued it failed to address the substance of the question regarding government accountability.

Shortly afterward, Nusron and Sudaryono attempted to leave the area, prompting students to block their path using traffic barriers. The confrontation led to pushing and shoving between protesters and security personnel near the southern entrance of the UGM campus.

What Message Did Students Deliver to the Government?

Following the incident, the UGM Student Union Alliance issued a statement describing the confrontation as a warning to the Prabowo-Gibran administration.

The students raised three main concerns: the government's willingness to listen to public criticism, unresolved agrarian conflicts, and what they see as a widening gap between the ideals of Pancasila and government policy.

They questioned how national unity could be achieved if dissenting voices were ignored, criticized the handling of land disputes and economic challenges, and challenged the administration to clarify whether its policies primarily serve public interests or political ambitions.

The statement concluded with a warning that public frustration could intensify if economic hardship and perceived injustices continue unaddressed.

The incident marked one of the most visible confrontations between university students and members of Prabowo's administration since the government took office, highlighting growing tensions over economic policy, governance, and democratic accountability.

Pribadi Wicaksono from Yogyakarta contributed to this article.

Read: Palace: No Deal Reached Between VP Gibran and Student Protesters

Click here to get the latest news updates from Tempo on Google News

Read Entire Article
Parenting |